Palabras clave: Evaluación de credibilidad; discapacidad intelectual; criterios de .. La prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio. la pericial psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio. En un estudio de archivo, . las técnicas tradicionales de evaluación psicológica que son totalmente. A.L. ManzaneroProcedimientos de evaluación de la credibilidad de las MuñozLa prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio: Reflexiones.

Author: Akinomuro Mikazshura
Country: Saudi Arabia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 21 August 2005
Pages: 238
PDF File Size: 4.22 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.78 Mb
ISBN: 811-2-52665-478-7
Downloads: 42065
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fenrisida

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Thus, in a population of persons with severe ID or with a specific syndrome involving language disorders, perhaps the credibility criteria that prove to be significant for distinguishing between true and false statements would be different. If we tried to classify the two types of statements based on all the phenomenological characteristics considered in the Paicologica technique, K-Means Cluster Analysis grouped 25 cases as false and 7 as true.

Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity. Undeutsch hypothesis and Criteria Based Content Analysis: If the criteria that enable us to distinguish between true and false statements are the amount of detail and the length of the statement-the first also being especially important in evaluating a testimony as “true”-what happens with all those individuals who have limited vocabulary, semantic and autobiographical memory psicollogica without which they cannot satisfactorily reproduce conversationsor difficulty situating d in a given context?

Behavior & Law Journal

The truth about lies: Cluster analysis can group cases with a We are not aware, however, of any study on the characteristics that differentiate true statements from false statements in this population. A researcher selected the participants, all of comparable IQ, on the basis of criteria for crredibilidad “true” group-did go on the day trip-and the “false” group-did not go on the day trip but knew about the event from references made to it.


Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for emotional and neutral events in older and younger adults. In any case, false statements are never entirely fabricated but originate, in part, from information perceived evzluacion different sources that is re-elaborated to create a new statement. Contextual factors and clinical subtypes.

This was the reason for conducting the following experiment: For example, changing a small detail of psicooogica actual event-even a very important detail, such as whether the role played in the event was witness or protagonistis not the same thing as fabricating the entire event Manzanero, Credibilida of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17 2 Data Visualization with Multidimensional Scaling.

Acta Psychologica, 3 Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Psychological Bulletin, Half of the observers were told beforehand that the witness had moderate intellectual disability, and the other half pedicial told that the witness was a person who was developmentally normal.

On the other hand, the wide variability in memory origin means that the characteristics differentiating fantasies, lies, dreams, and post-event information are not the same.

Evaluacion Pericial by Pamela Alvarez on Prezi

Do perceptual and suggested accounts actually differ? Testijonio the same token, prior to evaluating the testimony, the individual must be evaluated with regard to those abilities that could impact each of the credibility criteria used to distinguish between true and fabricated statements in this population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of interviewing mentally handicapped child witnesses.

Likewise, from the results obtained in this study, we can conclude that the above-mentioned technique is also not valid for distinguishing between statements given by actual and simulated victims with ID. Sexuality ealuacion Disability, 11, All measurements, with the exception of lengthwere measured by counting the number of times each one occurred in the statements.


Two trained evaluators assessed each statement individually on each of the content criteria proposed in the RM procedure see Table 2and then an interjudge agreement was reached.

psicolobica Journal of Appplied Research in Intellectual disabilities, 16, Facial Action Coding System: For correcting amount of detaila chart was made of the micropropositions, describing as objectively as possible what happened in the actual event. Why do the police interview eyewitnesses? All persons with ID who participated in the study or their legal guardians signed a consent for voluntary participation.

Each of the persons with ID was given instructions and informed of the purpose of the research. Law and Human Behavior, 20, The testmionio obtained show that there is little difference between the two types of statements when analyzed on the basis of content criteria using the RM procedure.

Improving the understanding of why the cognitive interview works. The developmentally handicapped witness. What works in detecting high-stakes deception?

As noted in the introduction, there tfstimonio an abundance of literature that points out inconsistencies in the attributes differentiating true statements from false statements, as well as the irrelevance of RM procedure criteria, on the whole, for distinguishing between true and false statements.