to ensure the soundness of the weld is use of DGS scales in Ultrasonic testing. order to bring the 3mm diameter disc on to curve II) then one uses the lines. Physics of NDT made clear by simulation · Ultrasonic Testing for Education · Eddy DGS (Distance Gain Size) or AVG (Abstand Verstaerkung Gröesse – in german) curves from manufacturer (Krautkrämer) are compared to simulation data for. block method the characteristic curve of the sound field is always determined before carrying out an ultrasonic test, whereas in the DGS method DGS diagrams.

Author: Gashicage Arashilmaran
Country: Malawi
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 24 June 2007
Pages: 410
PDF File Size: 1.47 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.79 Mb
ISBN: 849-8-78872-917-2
Downloads: 48318
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tautilar

The generated curves are derived from the calculated beam spreading pattern of a given transducer, based on its frequency and element diameter using a single calibration point. Please select the activities you want to receive information about: The input signal frequency is 2.

In the example shown above:. There is good agreement between simulation and ultraosnic. We reveal only the last five digits of your credit card numbers when confirming an order. For each hole, the maximum amplitude of the specular echoes of the FBH is measured relatively to a calibration hole. Roll over the probes to ultraosnic the defects. In a general DGS diagram the distance is shown in units of Near Field and the scale is logarithmic to cover a wide range.

It can be noted than all the FBH of this experiment are deeper than the focal spot. It also shows a backwall echo BE to which the technician sets the backwall echo as the reference sensitivity.

Traditionally this technique involved manually comparing echo amplitudes with printed curves, however contemporary digital flaw detectors can draw the curves following a calibration routine and automatically calculate the ERS of a gated peak. In the screen at right, a different reflector at a depth of approximately 26 mm has been gated.

When this concept was first established, the general DGS diagram was developed as shown below:.


UT – FBH: DGS curves

The information we learn from customers helps us personalise and continually improve the service we provide through our website and other channels. At longer beam paths, set the backwall to RE2 and add 8 dB. These types of scales are made specifically for a particular probe the B4S — 4 MHz, 24 mm diameter zero compression probe and shows a characteristic curve for 6 mm, 4 mm and 3 mm reflectors. This is not realistic, so the final modification to the DGS scales is to include a characteristic curve for a backwall reflection.

Rather than plotting the ultrssonic curve set, instruments will typically display one curve based on a selected reflector size registration level that can be adjusted by the user. Be sure to sign off when you finish using a shared computer.

DGS/AVG | Olympus IMS

Specific DGS curves for individual probes can be produced and so both the distance axis and the reflector sizes can be in mm. We work to protect the security of your information during transmission by using Secure Sockets Layer SSL software, which encrypts information you input. See the vgs hand vertical axis for extra gain required for RE1 an RE2. To learn more about how we use cookies on this website, and how you can restrict our use of cookies, please review our Cookie Policy.

From that one calibration point, an entire ultfasonic set can be drawn based on probe and material characteristics. There are also two other curves — RE1 and RE2. In the early days of development of the DGS approach to DGS sizing, it was necessary to employ this generalised approach.

Now consider a probe scanning over three identical discontinuities at varying beam path lengths:.

This site uses cookies to enhance performance, analyze traffic, and for ads measurement purposes. The Y-axis shows the Gain and X-axis shows the Distance from the probe.

For more information please read our privacy policy. Part Three Ultrqsonic Courses: Any personal information provided to or to be gathered by bindt. The measurements have been made with cgs following contact probes:. Frequency Crystal Mode Calibration flaw Calibration depth 1. BINDT knows that you care how information about you is used and shared and we appreciate your ultarsonic in us to do that carefully and sensibly. Index of acronyms D DGS.


This is a typical scale, and the shape of the curves and reference reflectors will depend on the test range, as well as the probe diameter and frequency. Back to Calibration defects.

This of course assumes that the reflectors are in the far zone and are smaller than the beam diameter. For more information on how to use a DGS diagram see: The lower curve is a reference that has been plotted 6 dB lower.

DGS evaluation is a very convenient and reproducible technique, with a number of specific applications. The interaction model is the Kirchhoff model which is well suited to specular echoes.

This curve shows a family of characteristic curves from 2 mm to 10 mm equivalent flat bottomed hole EFBH. This notice describes the privacy policy of bindt.

Menu More Contact Us. In the general diagram the size of reflector is given as a ratio between the size of the disc and the size of the crystal.

Non-destructive Testing Page

Of course, we transmit the entire credit card number to the appropriate credit card company during order processing. DGS is a sizing technique that relates the amplitude of the echo from a reflector to that of a flat bottom hold at the same depth or distance.

Material attenuation and coupling variation in the calibration block and test specimen can be accounted for.

Based on its height and depth in relation to the curve the instrument calculated an Ultrasomic of 1. In the screen at left, the red gate marks the reflection from a 2 mm diameter flat bottom hole at approximately 20 mm depth. A schematic of a general DGS diagram is shown in the Figure.