A working paper which describes a package of computer code for Bayesian VARs The BEAR Toolbox by Alistair Dieppe, Romain Legrand and Bjorn van Roye. Authors: Gary Koop, University of Strathclyde; Dale J. Poirier, University of to develop the computational tools used in modern Bayesian econometrics. This book introduces the reader to the use of Bayesian methods in the field of econometrics at the advanced undergraduate or graduate level. The book is.
|Published (Last):||5 March 2010|
|PDF File Size:||11.10 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.60 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Wiley Higher Education Supplementary Website
In the jargon of this literature, these should be overdispersed starting values. However, in general, econometricians choose to present var- ious numerical summaries of the information contained in the posterior, and these can involve integration.
In this book, we will not discuss such methodological issues see Poirier for more detail. The focus is on models used by applied economists and the computational techniques necessary to implement Bayesian methods when doing empirical work.
The matrix weighting does not imply that every individual coefficient lies between its prior mean and OLS estimate. A typical result hayesian this literature is of the form: The posterior means and standard deviations are similar to those in Table 3.
Note that, for both prior mean rconometrics the OLS estimate, the posterior mean attaches weight proportional to their precisions i. If we were to do Bayesian model averaging using these two models, we would attach This is commonly done, since it is often hard to make reasonable guesses about what they might be.
These can then be used to form the posterior, 1.
That is, Bayesian econometrics has historically been computationally difficult or impossible to do for all but a few specific classes of model. It bayeslan meant to be for people with little or no prior exposure to statistics, but I believe you may suffer a bit if you approach it from that point.
The Posterior Predictive P- Value 5. Even the predictive density in 1. As described above see the discussion after 4. The posterior standard deviations in Table 4. The Savage-Dickey Density Ratio Just as posterior inference cannot be done analytically, no analytical form for the marginal likelihood exists for the Normal linear regression model with indepen- dent Normal-Gamma prior. A key reason for this absence is the lack of a suitable kkop undergraduate or graduate level textbook.
With importance sampling, the draws Normal Linear Regression with Other Priors 83 from the importance function must be weighted as described in 4. In essence, the ideas of Bayesian econometrics are simple, since they only involve the rules of probability. For the reader who does not know what this means, do not worry. It is possible that a Gibbs sampler, if started out near the mean of one of these Normals, will just economdtrics there, yielding all replications from the region where the first of the Normals allocates appreciable probability.
However, it has one undesirable property: This, then, is a convenient place to start discussing posterior simulation. What happens to the mean and standard deviation of the importance sampling weights as vq increases? Topics covered in the book include the regression model and variants applicable for use with panel datatime series models, models for qualitative or censored data, nonparametric methods and Bayesian model averaging.
This density is referred to as an importance function. It is referred to as the Savage-Dickey density ratio. Formally, the Gibbs sampler involves the following steps. Assume a Gamma prior for 9: The other equations above also emphasize the intuition that the Bayesian pos- terior combines data and prior information.
: Bayesian Econometrics (): Gary Koop: Books
The key point to stress here is that an estimate of a 2 is available and can be calculated using the computer programs discussed above. In general, the focus of the book is on application rather than theory.
This reflects the intuitive notion that, in general, more information allows for more precise estimation.
Algo- rithms exist for taking random draws from many common densities e. Student-t Errors 6. However, for many econo- metric models, a natural choice of blocking suggests itself.
Thirdly, other things being equal, the posterior odds ratio will indicate support for the model where there is the greatest koo; between prior and data information i. The interested reader is referred to this paper for more detail. In the previous two cases, the Gibbs sampler is not wandering over the entire posterior distribution and this will imply the MCMC diagnostics considered so far are unreliable.